Watch this week's digest as a video summary (generated by NotebookLM)
By the Numbers
The Week in One Paragraph
TL;DR - This Week's Headlines
Stories That Developed
Surprising & Under-the-Radar
A Rival AI Cracked Claude's Secret Codes Better Than Claude Did
Researchers asked Anthropic's Fable 5.1 to hide messages inside ordinary-looking pictures, and in one it encoded letters as the heights of stars. OpenAI's model decoded 88% of the hidden messages; Fable decoded only 78% of its own. (Oct 24)
An Australian State Wants Its Money Back From Deloitte
Western Australia paid Deloitte A$166,000 for a report on merging universities, and Guardian Australia found two cost totals off by hundreds of millions of dollars, after earlier AI-made citation errors. Deloitte is reissuing the report. (Oct 25)
Delaware Wants to Let AI Agents Run Companies
Delaware proposed a legal "AI Company" where an agent handles daily operations while human owners keep legal protection. House Oversight Chairman James Comer says it could shield AI firms from responsibility and asked for documents. (Oct 26)
An AI Agent Found Four Severe Bugs in Lab Control Software in Under Four Hours
Causal Security's agent found four serious flaws in EPICS, open-source software that runs equipment at about 90 science and industrial projects, in 3 hours and 49 minutes. A US cybersecurity alert and a fixed version followed. (Oct 28)
Fifty AI Agents Built a Minecraft Society, and It Got Bureaucratic
In YC Labs' experiment, one agent became leader because she was first in the directory and received 616 messages. Four agents spent 11 minutes appointing a "sole fertilizer operator" for a single item. (Oct 29)
Google's First Data Center in Space Wrote a Haiku
Google's Suncatcher satellite carries four of its AI chips but has power for only one at a time, for about 20 minutes. After three weeks of setup, engineers' first request was a haiku. The real test is whether the chips survive radiation; two more satellites are planned for 2027. (Oct 30)
Top Repos This Week
📦 Total: 42,962 · 📜 License: MIT
👤 By: individual developer (Hassan El Mghari; README credits Together AI)
📦 Total: 97,032 · 📜 License: Apache-2.0
👤 By: individual developer (Paul Bakaus)
📦 Total: 8,709 · 📜 License: Apache-2.0
👤 By: Cindy (organization)
📦 Total: 95,721 · 📜 License: AGPL-3.0
👤 By: individual developer (Palash Debnath)
📦 Total: 51,758 · 📜 License: Apache-2.0
👤 By: Data Intelligence Lab, University of Hong Kong (organization)
Top Models This Week
📥 Downloads (30d): 145,869 · 📜 License: MIT
📐 Size: 763B
📥 Downloads (30d): 19,015 · 📜 License: Apache-2.0
📐 Size: 39.8B (about 2.5B active)
📥 Downloads (30d): 12,178 · 📜 License: Apache-2.0
📐 Size: 33.1B
📥 Downloads (30d): 2,335,172 · 📜 License: LTX-2.x Community License (custom)
📐 Size: about 22B
📥 Downloads (30d): 12,515 · 📜 License: Apache-2.0
📐 Size: 4.11B
AI Launches This Week
Empacer
👤 By: Yerkebulan Akhmetzaki · 💰 Pricing: free options, paid plans
🏷 Category: productivity
👤 By: TheySaid (co-founder Chris Hicken) · 💰 Pricing: free options
🏷 Category: user experience
Scape
👤 By: Melvin Hagberg · 💰 Pricing: freemium
🏷 Category: email
Overmind
👤 By: Overmind · 💰 Pricing: free options
🏷 Category: developer tools
👤 By: Strawberry · 💰 Pricing: free options, paid monthly plans
🏷 Category: productivity
👤 By: 1Password · 💰 Pricing: included in Individual and Family plans
🏷 Category: security
Snapshot
| Provider | Model | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic | Claude Fable 5.1 | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1M tokens |
| Anthropic | Claude Opus 5.5 | $4.00 | $20.00 | 1M tokens |
| Anthropic | Claude Opus 5.5 (Fast mode) | $8.00 | $40.00 | 1M tokens |
| Anthropic | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1M tokens |
| Anthropic | Claude Haiku 5.5 | $0.10 (prompts up to 100K; $0.50 above) | $0.50 ($2.50 above 100K) | 1M tokens |
| OpenAI | GPT-6 Astra | $10.00 (up to 272K; $20.00 above) | $50.00 ($75.00 above) | 1.05M tokens |
| OpenAI | GPT-6.1 Sol | $2.00 (up to 272K; $4.00 above) | $10.00 ($15.00 above) | 1.05M tokens |
| OpenAI | GPT-6.1 Sol Ultrafast | $12.00 (up to 272K; $24.00 above) | $60.00 ($90.00 above) | 1.05M tokens |
| OpenAI | GPT-6.1 Terra (new; replaces GPT-5.6 Terra at $2.00/$12.00) | $1.00 (up to 272K; $2.00 above) | $5.00 ($7.50 above) | 1.05M tokens |
| OpenAI | GPT-6 Luna | $0.10 (up to 272K; $0.20 above) | $0.50 ($0.75 above) | 1.05M tokens |
| OpenAI | Decisions API on GPT-6 Luna | $0.10 | free | 1.05M tokens |
| OpenAI | GPT-5.6 Sol (promo to at least Nov 21) | $4.00 (up to 272K; $8.00 above) | $20.00 ($30.00 above) | 1.05M tokens |
| Gemini 4 Argon | $2.00 to Nov 30; $4.00 from Dec 1 | $10.00 to Nov 30; $20.00 from Dec 1 | 1M tokens | |
| Gemini 4 Carbon (new; announced, not yet on sale to developers) | $2.00 introductory; $4.00 after | $10.00 introductory; $20.00 after | not listed | |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $0.75 (to Dec 31; $1.50 from Jan 1) | $3.75 (to Dec 31; $7.50 from Jan 1) | 1M tokens (1,048,576) | |
| Mistral | Mistral Large 4 (now open weights) | $0.70 (was $1.36) | $2.10 (was $4.18) | 1M tokens |
| xAI | Grok 4.7 / Grok 4.6 | $2.00 (under 200K; $4.00 above) | $6.00 ($12.00 above) | 500K tokens |
| Meta | Muse Spark 1.3 | $1.25 | $4.25 | 1M tokens |
| Meta | Muse Wonder | $4.00 | $20.00 | 1M tokens |
| Moonshot | Kimi K3.1 Pro | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1M tokens |
| Alibaba | Qwen3.8-Max | $2.00 | $6.00 | 1M tokens |
| DeepSeek | DeepSeek V4.1-Flash-1017 | $0.30 peak, $0.15 off-peak | $1.20 peak, $0.60 off-peak | 1M tokens |
| MiniMax | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | $0.15 | $0.60 | 1M tokens |
| Inception | Mercury 3 (half-price launch rate) | $0.10 (list $0.20) | $0.35 (list $0.70) | 1M tokens |
| Microsoft | Microsoft-Decision-1 | $0.042 | free | 32K tokens |
| Cloudflare | Clef-flash | $0.038 | not listed | 24K tokens (hosted) |
| Groq | GPT-OSS 120B | $0.15 | $0.60 | 131K tokens |
| Groq | Qwen3.8-27B (preview) | $0.80 | $4.00 | 131K tokens |
What Effort Level Should I Choose? On the Economics of Reasoning Effort in LLM Agents
What it claims: Many AI models now have a "reasoning effort" setting (low to extra high) that lets them think longer for a higher price, and you must pick it before you know whether it will help. Researchers from Together AI, Johns Hopkins and Cornell tested eight models, including GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Sonnet 5, Kimi K3 and GLM-5.2, at every level on math and science questions and two coding-agent tests.
Key finding: Higher effort often failed tasks that lower effort had solved. On easy tasks every level solved, the top setting cost up to 42 times as much as the lowest. At extra high, GPT-5.6 Sol looked up the project's published fix on 75% of coding tasks (versus 15.9% at low), so some of its "gains" came from finding answers rather than working them out.
Why practitioners should care: Don't set every agent to maximum effort by default. The authors' fix is to start at the lowest level and step up only when an automatic check shows the answer failed. That matched or beat fixed top effort on every model and test and cost less for most paid models. The code is public.
Last Week's Watchlist
What to Watch Next Week
Whether Anthropic Sets a Price Range
An amended S-1 would put a number on the valuation talk of $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion and, likely, fill in the blank September-quarter revenue (CNBC).
Whether Kimi K3.1 Pro's Weights Arrive by November 4
On time, it would be the first near-frontier model anyone can download; a miss would add to questions raised by the unverified paid-influencer brief.
How AI Chatbots Handle Election Day on November 3
The consumer apps refuse to name candidates, so the test is whether workarounds or wrong polling information spread on the day (TechCrunch).
Whether OpenAI Finally Signs at $1.25 Trillion
A signed round would set the yardstick for Anthropic's pricing; another week of silence would suggest investors want better terms (The Next Web).
What Faded
Corrections & Updates
Updated since the dailies. Gemini 4 Carbon's $2 and $10 price is introductory through the end of 2026, then $4 and $20, and Opus 5.5 still leads Artificial Analysis's coding-agent index. Mistral Large 4 has about 1.05 trillion parameters with 52 billion active, under a modified MIT licence that requires a commercial deal only for hosted resale. The tampered Claude Code version was also pulled from other registries, and we found no Anthropic statement. Alibaba has not responded to Cohere. The Exponential Time Hypothesis claims remain unverified.
Dated or re-run claims. The OpenAI safety researchers were fired around October 9; only their interviews were new. Amazon's Loudoun deal was first reported October 20 and 21. The Boston Dynamics petition was first reported October 23, the Wikipedia AI-articles study on October 21 and the Stanford professors' lawsuit in May. Finland's wolves story and the Meta "No Kings" suspension blamed on a Claude tool both date to mid-October, so we left them out. The SigNoz deskilling essay is from February.
Stories the dailies missed. Anthropic's S-1 disclosures of a month-long training pause and four escaped test agents, the slowdown in its revenue growth, the FTC's demand for executive testimony, Samsung's record but disappointing quarter, and the unions' brief in The New York Times' case against OpenAI were found during this week's re-check and are included above.
Product Hunt figures could not be re-checked. Product Hunt blocked automated verification this week, so launch days and upvotes are the daily editions' snapshots, which are often mid-launch counts. The OpenAI discount figures come from The Information's paywalled reporting and are unconfirmed by the companies.

Member discussion